Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Budget and Programs at UGA
International Street Festival
Woman and Globalization
As globalization breaks down economic inequalities there is hope that it will also destroy gender lines “by eliminating barriers and expanding opportunities,” said Deborah Gonzalez.
“A lot of women are doing a lot of the work without getting the economic benefits to help the family,” Gonzales said in a Friday presentation sponsored by International Public Service and Outreach. Yet, “the burden of feeding for the family often falls on the women.”
Still, globalization can provide an opening for women around the world so that they can increase their importance and self-esteem.
“By exposing cultures to other cultures, women get a sense of what is happening to women elsewhere and can use them as a model to increase their own position,” Gonzalez said in her talk titled “Princesses of the Pyre: Globalization and its Impact on Women in Developing Countries.”
Emily Corbin, a freshman from Augusta, said after the talk, “Regardless of where they live, I’m connected to all the women in the world.”
However, many women are still caught in systems that deny them any rights and often put them in situations of violence and rape.
Gonzalez said, “Women become no longer human. They don’t become the sisters, mothers, and wives. They become objects. They become war loot.”
Violence is not the only problem. Women are often “left to fend for themselves” as their husbands leave to find work in other countries, she continued. They face the “son preference,” an idea in many cultures that the sons should be educated and receive opportunities, as opposed to the daughters, who stay at home.
Even women who overcome the odds to gain an education do not always have the chance to use it.
Gonzalez gave the example of Rowena Bautista, an immigrant from the Philippines, who has several years of engineering training, but works as a nanny to send back to her children $450 of the $750 she makes each month. Bautista’s husband works in Korea and she has not seen her children for several years because they live with their grandmother. Yet, the money she makes is much more than she could earn in the Philippines, and so she stays.
“Half the world’s migrant are women and of those women, the majority are mothers who leave their children,” said Gonzalez.
Gonzalez ended her talk with an encouragement to gain “exposure to different perspectives” by becoming more aware of international news, and thereby more prepared to fix the problems that face the world.
“[This talk] pointed out how lucky we are being women in America,” said Vanessa Vina, a freshman from Snellville. “Just being here means we have a better start.”Nuclear Panel Expresses Optimism Over Disarmament
The optimism about nuclear disarmament expressed by experts including a former Nobel Peace Prize winner surprised students Wednesday during a program for the celebration of the 20th anniversary of the Center for International Trade and Security.
Nuclear weapons offer a way to gain “power and prestige” in world diplomacy, said Mohamed ElBaradei, the winner of the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize. According to ElBaradei, that is why Russia is reluctant to give up nuclear weapons, and why Iran wants to develop nuclear weapons.
Igor Khripunov, former advisor to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and now associate dean of the Center, expressed the most doubt that Russia would ever give up their nuclear weapons.
“The legacy is so overloaded that it is difficult to be optimistic that the negotiations will move fast,” Khripunov said. “It may take a miracle for us [Russia] to reach our goal of drastic nuclear reductions.”
But he reminded the audience that miracles have happened, citing the 1985 meeting between Gorbachev and President Ronald Reagan.
In response, Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, said, “I think that you are way too pessimistic about this.” He, along with ElBaradei, was hopeful that nuclear weapons can one day be abolished.
“This might be the moment where we actually get to resolve this issue,” said Cirincione. He went so far to say that he was more optimistic now than he had been at any time in his career.
In response to this talk, Maggie Mills, a senior from Champagne, Ill., said, “I thought it was fairly insightful and extremely positive given all the issues and problems that are in the world, having four experts say that it [nuclear disarmament] may not happen soon, but we’ll find a way.”
The fourth member of the panel, Eugene Habiger, the former commander of Strategic Command said he was not so sure that nuclear weapons could be gotten rid of so easily.
“I personally feel we will never get there as you can’t put the genie back in the bottle,” he said. However, later on he added, “It is better to have incremental steps than no progress at all.”
Mills agreed with him.
“I think that there is a hope or chance of getting nuclear weapons to 100 or 200 per country, something much more manageable than the 27,000 in the world now,” she said.
ElBaradei mentioned the concept of a “multi-national fuel cycle” as a possible solution to the problem of nuclear weapons.
A multi-national fuel cycle would require countries to give up their own production of fuel for nuclear reactors and rely on international sources. These international fuel cycles would not produce the enriched uranium or plutonium that is required to make nuclear weapons; instead, nuclear power could be produced by a slower reaction that does not result in an explosion.
Nuclear disarmament does not preclude the use of nuclear power.Panelists said they hoped for a “nuclear renaissance” when nuclear weapons arevilified, but nuclear power could be utilized.
Even after this solution was presented, some students were not as hopeful.
“I feel like in their line of work they have to exude that optimism, but I feel that the timeline they presented is ignoring too many security threats and economic problems,” said Tawny Waltz, a third-year student from Macon.
Bilal Yousufzai, brought up the diplomatic relationships between the United States and other countries.
“I don’t think we going to interact well with other states that we might have upset previously,” the senior from Augusta said.
Yet, Cirincione said that the Obama administration is approaching countries Iran, in the correct manner. The Bush administration had refused to talk to Iran without preconditions. President Obama’s staff has changed their view.
“The past policy, the effort to coerce Iran into compliance, completely failed,” he said. “They [the Obama administration] are extending the hand of friendship, and they are not in a rush.”